Looking about online has gotten me thinking of a few ways they could fix electronic voting. All of them should be simple and easy to do.
- Stick with punchcard voting, but use a machine to punch the cards perfectly every time.
Meaning, you put your card into the machine, punch in your selection, and it gives you back your card, perfectly punched. The card itself would be designed in a simple way as well, so that the voter could just look at it afterward, and tell from it that it was correct, just by comparing it to their voter guide.
- Make the software, and hardware completely open source, and open to view.
The government needs to just buy the rights to the source code for a voting machine, then post them onto a website for the world to see.
Voting machines need to be able to be freely inspected by anyone that should be able to inspect them. They should also have an example of one on display in places like city halls a couple weeks before the election, so the public could examine them as well. This would ensure that everyone could agree that the machines were secure, and good.
This brings me to my next point.
- Get the people that make slot machines to make the voting machines.
Casinos care more about their money than the government cares about your votes, and that's not right. This is a democracy, your voice is the voice of the country. If your voice is taken away, then you are being denied one of your basic rights.
So I say, they make the voting machine as secure as a slot machine, and treat it as if it were full of money. Don't leave it overnight, unattended in someone's house! ( Look for: "overnight" )
- Get money out of politics.
This one isn't really about the voting booths or anything, but I'm just throwing this in here.
Sure we have the separation of church and state, or at least we're supposed to, but I think that's not enough. We need a separation of of corporation and state as well.
The current setup of government has become centered almost entirely around benefiting corporations over people. Whenever a law comes up that might limit them in some way it's nerfed down, until it is harmless to them, does nothing to change anything, and just appeases the people for a little while.
I propose a vast change in government that would move to prevent greed, and corporations from corrupting everything. First off, elections are ridiculously expensive. In the 2004 election $880,000,000 were spent. 367 million by Bush, 328 million by Kerry. The nearest third runner up, Nader, only spent 4 million.
There is no good reason that they should spend that much on ANY election. They need to have a spending limit, so all candidates would have an equal say.
Also, all donations to anyone in public office must be made public. To not do so should be a federal offense, for all involved.
Lastly, lets route the money we're pouring into war into a good health care system instead. I'd much rather have my tax money spent on saving lives, rather than taking them, wouldn't you?